Prop Firm Comparison: Where They Truly Differ
The table below lists each firm’s hard numbers. This article highlights the differences that actually change your trading experience—so you can spot which firm fits your strategy in seconds.

E8 Markets
E8 Markets is a US-based proprietary trading firm offering a clear and flexible funding model with high profit splits, scalable capital, and multiple evaluation phases. Its strong presence and technology focus support efficient trading and quick payouts.

FundedNext
FundedNext is a UAE-based prop trading firm founded in 2022 offering a flexible and trader-focused model with high profit splits, rapid payouts, and no challenge time limits. The firm provides a modern trading environment backed by AI and wide community engagement.
Key Differences
Note: Information is for reference only; please visit the firm’s official website for the most accurate and up-to-date details.
Pros & Cons
E8 Markets — Pros
- Profit split can reach 100% on certain programs.
- No minimum or maximum trading days during evaluation.
- Multiple tracks including 1-step, 2-step, and optional 3-step progression.
- Account scaling available up to $1,000,000.
- On-demand payouts available with a $40 minimum withdrawal.
- Supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, and TradeLocker.
- Broad instrument coverage across FX, indices, commodities, metals, stocks, and crypto.
E8 Markets — Cons
- News trading is restricted on some phases.
FundedNext — Pros
- Up to 95% profit split depending on challenge and performance tiers.
- No evaluation time limit on popular tracks.
- Offers both 1-step and 2-step evaluation models.
- Fast payouts and multiple withdrawal methods.
- Scaling plan is available post-funding.
- Supports MetaTrader platforms (MT4/MT5).
- Diverse market coverage across FX, indices, commodities, metals, stocks, and crypto.
FundedNext — Cons
- Some tracks enforce minimum trading days during evaluation.
- Daily loss and overall drawdown rules are comparatively tight.
- News-trading rules may be restricted for certain instruments or phases.
Model & Time Limits: Pace vs. Pressure
- Instant / One-step models favor traders who want quick funding and minimal phases—usually higher fees but faster start.
- Two-phase models trim upfront cost and add verification, but Time Limits can add pressure if you need more trades to realize edge.
- No time limit or lenient windows reduce forced trades; tight windows reward fast, high-activity approaches.
Risk Rules: DD (Daily/Overall) & Max Loss
- Stricter Daily DD = tougher for scalpers during volatility; looser Daily DD = more room for heat intraday.
- Higher Overall DD / Max Loss cushions swing holds; lower buffers suit disciplined, tight-stop systems.
- News Trading allowed favors event traders; restricted news reduces gap risk but limits catalysts.
Payout & Split: Cash Flow vs. Percentage
- Earlier first payout (7–14 days) + frequent cycles = smoother cash flow—even if the split is slightly lower.
- Higher splits shine only if timing, caps, and fees don’t slow you down.
- When two firms tie on split, choose the one with fewer payout frictions (methods, fees, thresholds).
Scaling / Max Allocation: Real Path vs. Big Number
- Clear, incremental scaling (defined profit targets & min days) beats a flashy Max Allocation you’ll rarely reach.
- Shorter milestones reward consistent returns; longer gates suit patient compounding.
Platforms & Tradable Assets: Execution Fit
- Multiple platforms (MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView) = flexibility. Single-platform firms can be fine if execution is stable.
- Broader asset lists (indices, FX, commodities, crypto, stocks) unlock more setups; narrow menus force concentration risk.
Commissions: Quiet Edge Eroder
- Lower per-lot/contract commissions preserve edge for active traders; higher costs can negate a better split.
- When two firms feel identical, pick the cheaper fill—it compounds every session.
Restricted Countries: Eligibility & Payout Practicalities
- Check Restricted Countries first—eligibility, KYC friction, and payout rails differ by region.
- If your country is borderline, choose firms with clear guidance and multiple withdrawal methods.
Pros & Cons: How to Read Them Quickly
- Generous drawdown but stricter news → great for non-event strategies.
- Fast payouts but higher commissions → suits low-turnover setups.
- Big scaling but tight time limits → favors high-activity traders.
Make the Call in 5 Checks
- Model & Time — need speed (instant/1-step) or flexibility (no/lenient limits)?
- Risk Rules — DD & Max Loss align with your drawdown profile?
- Payout Mechanics — first payout timing & cycle fit your cash flow?
- Scaling Reality — milestones you can actually hit?
- Costs & Execution — commissions + platform stability ok for your style?
Then use the table’s Discount link, check Trustpilot sentiment, and Visit website for fine print.