Prop Firm Comparison: Where They Truly Differ
The table below lists each firm’s hard numbers. This article highlights the differences that actually change your trading experience—so you can spot which firm fits your strategy in seconds.
Blue Guardian Capital (BGC)
Active AE 2–4 yrs
Blue Guardian Capital is a UAE-based proprietary trading firm operating for about 4 years, offering multiple challenge models with varying leverage on different asset types. Commissions are applied on FX, Metals, and other commodities, while indices and crypto trading have no commission.
Blueberry Funded
Active VU <2 yrs
Blueberry Funded is backed by Blueberry Markets, a globally recognized broker with over 8 years of industry history and regulation under ASIC. They launched in August 2024, offering flexible, scalable funding challenges with efficient payouts and strong trader support.
Key Differences
Note: Information is for reference only; please visit the firm’s official website for the most accurate and up-to-date details.
Criteria
Blue Guardian Capital (BGC)
Active AE 2–4 yrs
Blueberry Funded
Active VU <2 yrs
Scaling:
Yes, leverage scaling up to 1:100 on most assets
Yes, scaling up to $2,000,000 every 3 months
Max Allocation:
Up to $400,000
Up to $400,000 per trader/household
Model / Profit Targets:
Instant, 1-Step, 2-Steps, 3-Steps
Multi-challenge (1-Step, 2-Step, Rapid, Stock, Synthetic)
Time Limits:
Not explicitly stated
No limits generally; Rapid challenge 7 days
DD (Daily/Overall):
Varies by asset; Forex 1:30-1:100 leverage, Metals/Indices/Other commodities 1:10-1:20, Crypto 1:2 leverage
Daily 2-5%, Overall 4-10% depending on challenge
Max Loss:
Not explicitly stated
Approx. 6-10% depending on challenge
News Trading:
Not explicitly stated
Prohibited
Payout:
Payment methods listed but no detailed terms
Bi-weekly; optional 7-day payout add-on (with fee)
Split:
Not explicitly stated
Starts 80% up to 90% based on performance
Platforms:
Not explicitly stated
MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker
Tradable Assets:
Forex, Metals, Indices, Crypto, Other Commodities
Forex, Metals, Indices, Crypto, Stocks, Commodities
Commissions & Spreads:
$5 per lot FX, Metals, Other Commodities; No commission for Indices and Crypto
N/A
Country Access:
North Korea, Syria
N/A
Pros & Cons
Blue Guardian Capital (BGC) — Pros
- Multiple paths including Instant, 1-step, 2-steps, and 3-steps.
- Broad asset coverage across FX, metals, indices, crypto, and other commodities.
- Leverage scales up to 1:100 on many assets, favoring active intraday styles.
- Zero commissions on indices and crypto with transparent $5/lot on FX and metals.
Blue Guardian Capital (BGC) — Cons
- Key terms like profit split, time limits, and max-loss are not clearly disclosed.
- News-trading rules are unspecified, reducing predictability for news strategies.
- Country access limitations may restrict some traders.
- Platform availability is not explicitly stated, which may limit platform choice.
Blueberry Funded — Pros
- Multiple tracks including 1-step, 2-step, Rapid, and specialized Stock/Synthetic options.
- No general time limit on most challenges, allowing flexible pacing.
- Competitive split starting at 80% and scaling to 90% with performance.
- Wide platform support (MT4/MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker) and broad asset list.
- Published scaling path up to $2,000,000 with reviews about every 3 months.
- Optional 7-day payout add-on for faster withdrawals.
Blueberry Funded — Cons
- News trading is prohibited, limiting certain strategies.
- The Rapid track imposes a 7-day window that can pressure execution.
- Risk limits can be tight on some tracks (≈2–5% daily and ≈4–10% total).
- The accelerated payout option requires an extra fee.
- Around $400,000 cap per trader/household pre-scaling may constrain high-cap traders.
Model & Time Limits: Pace vs. Pressure
- Instant / One-step models favor traders who want quick funding and minimal phases—usually higher fees but faster start.
- Two-phase models trim upfront cost and add verification, but Time Limits can add pressure if you need more trades to realize edge.
- No time limit or lenient windows reduce forced trades; tight windows reward fast, high-activity approaches.
Risk Rules: DD (Daily/Overall) & Max Loss
- Stricter Daily DD = tougher for scalpers during volatility; looser Daily DD = more room for heat intraday.
- Higher Overall DD / Max Loss cushions swing holds; lower buffers suit disciplined, tight-stop systems.
- News Trading allowed favors event traders; restricted news reduces gap risk but limits catalysts.
Payout & Split: Cash Flow vs. Percentage
- Earlier first payout (7–14 days) + frequent cycles = smoother cash flow—even if the split is slightly lower.
- Higher splits shine only if timing, caps, and fees don’t slow you down.
- When two firms tie on split, choose the one with fewer payout frictions (methods, fees, thresholds).
Scaling / Max Allocation: Real Path vs. Big Number
- Clear, incremental scaling (defined profit targets & min days) beats a flashy Max Allocation you’ll rarely reach.
- Shorter milestones reward consistent returns; longer gates suit patient compounding.
Platforms & Tradable Assets: Execution Fit
- Multiple platforms (MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView) = flexibility. Single-platform firms can be fine if execution is stable.
- Broader asset lists (indices, FX, commodities, crypto, stocks) unlock more setups; narrow menus force concentration risk.
Commissions: Quiet Edge Eroder
- Lower per-lot/contract commissions preserve edge for active traders; higher costs can negate a better split.
- When two firms feel identical, pick the cheaper fill—it compounds every session.
Restricted Countries: Eligibility & Payout Practicalities
- Check Restricted Countries first—eligibility, KYC friction, and payout rails differ by region.
- If your country is borderline, choose firms with clear guidance and multiple withdrawal methods.
Pros & Cons: How to Read Them Quickly
- Generous drawdown but stricter news → great for non-event strategies.
- Fast payouts but higher commissions → suits low-turnover setups.
- Big scaling but tight time limits → favors high-activity traders.
Make the Call in 5 Checks
- Model & Time — need speed (instant/1-step) or flexibility (no/lenient limits)?
- Risk Rules — DD & Max Loss align with your drawdown profile?
- Payout Mechanics — first payout timing & cycle fit your cash flow?
- Scaling Reality — milestones you can actually hit?
- Costs & Execution — commissions + platform stability ok for your style?
Then use the table’s Discount link, check Trustpilot sentiment, and Visit website for fine print.
FAQs
What’s the fastest path to first payout?
Firms with early first payout windows (often 7–14 days) and weekly/bi-weekly cycles. Confirm fees and caps.
Which firms suit news/event traders?
Those explicitly allowing news trading or with clearly defined windows. If restricted, plan around releases.
How do I break a tie between two similar firms?
Pick the one with looser Daily DD, cheaper commissions, or simpler payout rules—whichever matters most to your P&L.
