Prop Firm Comparison: Where They Truly Differ
The table below lists each firm’s hard numbers. This article highlights the differences that actually change your trading experience—so you can spot which firm fits your strategy in seconds.
Atmos Funded
Active AE <2 yrs
Atmos Funded is a broker-backed firm powered by Taurex, headquartered in Dubai, offering trader-friendly evaluation models with no time limits, flexible scaling, and up to 90% profit split. Traders benefit from a clear, predictable daily drawdown rule with daily resets, multi-asset trading on popular platforms, and fast bi-weekly payouts with multiple withdrawal options.
Blueberry Funded
Active VU <2 yrs
Blueberry Funded is backed by Blueberry Markets, a globally recognized broker with over 8 years of industry history and regulation under ASIC. They launched in August 2024, offering flexible, scalable funding challenges with efficient payouts and strong trader support.
Key Differences
Note: Information is for reference only; please visit the firm’s official website for the most accurate and up-to-date details.
Criteria
Atmos Funded
Active AE <2 yrs
Blueberry Funded
Active VU <2 yrs
Scaling:
Yes, performance review every 3 months, capital can increase up to 50%
Yes, scaling up to $2,000,000 every 3 months
Max Allocation:
Up to $200,000
Up to $400,000 per trader/household
Model / Profit Targets:
Two challenge models: 1-phase (10% profit target), 2-phase (8% + 5% profit targets)
Multi-challenge (1-Step, 2-Step, Rapid, Stock, Synthetic)
Time Limits:
No time limits for challenges
No limits generally; Rapid challenge 7 days
DD (Daily/Overall):
1-phase: 3% daily loss, 6% max trailing drawdown; 2-phase: 5% daily loss, 10% max static drawdown
Daily 2-5%, Overall 4-10% depending on challenge
Max Loss:
6% to 10% depending on challenge type
Approx. 6-10% depending on challenge
News Trading:
Allowed during evaluation, banned during funded phase near news events
Prohibited
Payout:
Every 14 days, minimum withdrawal $100, payouts via bank wire, crypto, or transfer to Taurex live account with 10% bonus
Bi-weekly; optional 7-day payout add-on (with fee)
Split:
Up to 90% profit split
Starts 80% up to 90% based on performance
Platforms:
MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader
MT4, MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker
Tradable Assets:
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto (BTC, ETH), Stocks (coming soon)
Forex, Metals, Indices, Crypto, Stocks, Commodities
Pros & Cons
Atmos Funded — Pros
- Offers both 1-phase (≈10% target) and 2-phase (≈8% then ≈5%) challenges.
- Profit split up to 90% for strong performers.
- No time limit on either track.
- Allows EAs and news trading during evaluation (some restrictions may apply after funding).
- Short payout cycle (every ~14 days) and multiple withdrawal methods; optional bonus for routing profits to a partner live account.
Atmos Funded — Cons
- No fee refund after passing in most cases.
- The 1-phase track has tight risk: ~3% daily and ~6% trailing/total drawdown, which can be unforgiving.
- News trading restricted on funded (short blackout window before/after major news).
- No weekend holding; positions must be closed before the weekend.
- Lower leverage (e.g., ~1:30 FX; ~1:5–1:10 on other instruments).
- Public scaling details are not very clear (claims of periodic increases but limited transparency on upper caps).
Blueberry Funded — Pros
- Multiple tracks including 1-step, 2-step, Rapid, and specialized Stock/Synthetic options.
- No general time limit on most challenges, allowing flexible pacing.
- Competitive split starting at 80% and scaling to 90% with performance.
- Wide platform support (MT4/MT5, DXtrade, TradeLocker) and broad asset list.
- Published scaling path up to $2,000,000 with reviews about every 3 months.
- Optional 7-day payout add-on for faster withdrawals.
Blueberry Funded — Cons
- News trading is prohibited, limiting certain strategies.
- The Rapid track imposes a 7-day window that can pressure execution.
- Risk limits can be tight on some tracks (≈2–5% daily and ≈4–10% total).
- The accelerated payout option requires an extra fee.
- Around $400,000 cap per trader/household pre-scaling may constrain high-cap traders.
Model & Time Limits: Pace vs. Pressure
- Instant / One-step models favor traders who want quick funding and minimal phases—usually higher fees but faster start.
- Two-phase models trim upfront cost and add verification, but Time Limits can add pressure if you need more trades to realize edge.
- No time limit or lenient windows reduce forced trades; tight windows reward fast, high-activity approaches.
Risk Rules: DD (Daily/Overall) & Max Loss
- Stricter Daily DD = tougher for scalpers during volatility; looser Daily DD = more room for heat intraday.
- Higher Overall DD / Max Loss cushions swing holds; lower buffers suit disciplined, tight-stop systems.
- News Trading allowed favors event traders; restricted news reduces gap risk but limits catalysts.
Payout & Split: Cash Flow vs. Percentage
- Earlier first payout (7–14 days) + frequent cycles = smoother cash flow—even if the split is slightly lower.
- Higher splits shine only if timing, caps, and fees don’t slow you down.
- When two firms tie on split, choose the one with fewer payout frictions (methods, fees, thresholds).
Scaling / Max Allocation: Real Path vs. Big Number
- Clear, incremental scaling (defined profit targets & min days) beats a flashy Max Allocation you’ll rarely reach.
- Shorter milestones reward consistent returns; longer gates suit patient compounding.
Platforms & Tradable Assets: Execution Fit
- Multiple platforms (MT4/MT5/cTrader/TradingView) = flexibility. Single-platform firms can be fine if execution is stable.
- Broader asset lists (indices, FX, commodities, crypto, stocks) unlock more setups; narrow menus force concentration risk.
Commissions: Quiet Edge Eroder
- Lower per-lot/contract commissions preserve edge for active traders; higher costs can negate a better split.
- When two firms feel identical, pick the cheaper fill—it compounds every session.
Restricted Countries: Eligibility & Payout Practicalities
- Check Restricted Countries first—eligibility, KYC friction, and payout rails differ by region.
- If your country is borderline, choose firms with clear guidance and multiple withdrawal methods.
Pros & Cons: How to Read Them Quickly
- Generous drawdown but stricter news → great for non-event strategies.
- Fast payouts but higher commissions → suits low-turnover setups.
- Big scaling but tight time limits → favors high-activity traders.
Make the Call in 5 Checks
- Model & Time — need speed (instant/1-step) or flexibility (no/lenient limits)?
- Risk Rules — DD & Max Loss align with your drawdown profile?
- Payout Mechanics — first payout timing & cycle fit your cash flow?
- Scaling Reality — milestones you can actually hit?
- Costs & Execution — commissions + platform stability ok for your style?
Then use the table’s Discount link, check Trustpilot sentiment, and Visit website for fine print.
FAQs
What’s the fastest path to first payout?
Firms with early first payout windows (often 7–14 days) and weekly/bi-weekly cycles. Confirm fees and caps.
Which firms suit news/event traders?
Those explicitly allowing news trading or with clearly defined windows. If restricted, plan around releases.
How do I break a tie between two similar firms?
Pick the one with looser Daily DD, cheaper commissions, or simpler payout rules—whichever matters most to your P&L.
