SFX Funded: Up to 70% Off Plus Extra 5% Reduction on Evaluation AccountsVerified

5% OFF CLAIM DEAL
SHOW CODE

Up to 70% Off Plus Extra 5% Reduction and a Free Reset

SFX Funded is currently offering up to 70% off standard pricing with an additional 5% reduction at checkout and a free reset, valid for a 48-hour window. This promotion strictly reduces the upfront entry cost and does not alter the firm’s evaluation criteria or risk parameters.

This limited-time offer automatically reduces the initial purchase price of evaluation programs by up to 70%, while applying the active promotion at checkout provides a further 5% discount. The package includes a reset entitlement for the evaluation phase but maintains the standard operational procedures without modifying any core trading constraints. The entire promotion is explicitly governed by a 48-hour countdown timer.

Who this may suit

This pricing structure may suit prospective traders looking to acquire an evaluation program at a significantly lower initial cost within the specified 48-hour period.

Who should be cautious

This 48-hour offer should be approached cautiously if an individual feels undue urgency from the countdown timer and is not fully prepared for the strict evaluation parameters.

What this discount does not change

The promotion strictly lowers the evaluation price and adds a reset provision, meaning all existing profit targets, daily drawdown limits, and maximum loss rules remain completely unchanged.

Quick summary

  • Discount: Up to 70% off automatically, an extra 5% off at checkout, plus a free reset
  • Type: Coupon
  • Applies to: Evaluation accounts
  • Validity: 48 hours
  • Best suited for: Traders seeking a reduced upfront entry cost
  • Apply via link: https://propfirmdiscount.com/go/sfxfunded
Up to 70% Off Plus Extra 5% Reduction on Evaluation Pricing
This 48-hour promotion reduces the upfront fee by up to 70% with an extra 5% reduction at checkout and a free reset. Evaluation risk limits remain completely unchanged.

Recent deals from SFX Funded

Title Coupon Code Discount
Flash Sale: Extra 15% Off and Free Reset Published: February 22, 2026
15%
70%
Only $138
Just $24
70%

Propfirmdiscount.com is free to use. If you use our links, we may earn a small commission that does not increase your price. In return, we aim to keep deal info accurate and timely.

Share your real experience with SFX Funded

Honest reviews – positive or negative – help traders decide with confidence.

No reviews yet.
0 reviews
This prop firm has no user reviews yet on PFD. Be the first to report your experience.
All reviews are submitted by users and reflect personal experiences only. This website does not verify, investigate, or endorse any claims made in user reviews.

Recent reviews SFX Funded on Trustpilot

3.5 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜† Based on 112 reviews
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
By Dee Jones
February 20, 2026

I am interested with SFX Funded with…

I am interested with SFX Funded with its Instant account that provides 20% consistency which is also favourable to a trader
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
By Leuco Olmos Bahena
February 3, 2026

2x account

Its my second time with sfx the first time they fail my account because I breach some rules they tell me. But then when I try again I check very clearly to make no mistakes and this time I get my funded account and my payment. So now I can say they can be trusted.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Diego
February 15, 2026

rejected my withdrawals 2 time scam…

rejected my withdrawals 2 time scam propfirm.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Saqib
February 13, 2026

Sfx scam

Scam firm not acive discord support
Chip also scammer
β˜…β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Aaron
January 27, 2026

Rule Compliant Trading, Yet Disqualified by Internal Interpretation

I was asked by SFX Funded’s legal team to reframe my original review, so I am providing a more detailed account of my experience and how I understood the situation.
The firm informed me that, after a β€œcomprehensive review,” they believed my trading behaviour fell outside their acceptable framework. From my perspective, my activity consisted of discretionary swing trading in gold and silver during a sustained bullish period, which I believed was permitted under their stated rules.
They cited β€œpersistent one sided exposure.” My understanding is that this reflected my directional bias following market structure. I did take occasional short trades to test potential reversals, but the broader trend remained bullish, so I maintained long exposure as part of a normal swing trading approach rather than as a fixed or systematic bias.
They also mentioned β€œexcessive trade frequency and cycling behaviour.” I traded manually and held one position per account at a time. I did not use automation, high frequency execution, or strategies intended to generate artificial volume. My intention was to scale into or reassess positions as market conditions evolved, which I considered standard discretionary management.
Regarding β€œtrading patterns inconsistent with sustainable risk management,” all trades were placed with defined risk in mind. Early on I misunderstood one aspect of their drawdown interpretation, but I adjusted once it became clear. At no point did I believe I was operating outside their written rules.
They further referenced β€œbehaviour indicative of account churning across multiple accounts.” I maintained two accounts to separate risk and avoid concentrating exposure, not to cycle or exploit evaluation mechanics. I traded them independently and never mirrored positions in a way I understood to be prohibited.
The firm clarified that even if individual trades did not breach a rule, their decision was based on an overall behavioural assessment. This appears to rely on internal discretion rather than on specific rule violations, which made it difficult for me to understand how to remain compliant going forward.
At the time this review process began, my account balance was in profit and I expected, based on performance, a payout significantly larger than the purchase cost of the accounts. Instead, I was offered either a reset under stricter interpretation or a refund of the account fees, and I chose the refund to conclude the matter.
Support communication remained polite and the refund was processed as stated. However, my experience suggests that traders should understand that evaluations may depend not only on written rules, but also on internal behavioural assessments that are not always transparent from the outset.

Latest Deals

Prop Firm Discount
Logo