FundingTraders 2026 Pricing: 2-Step Accounts Starting at $59

I took a challenge from them. I only trade gold and forex.
My account was finished by a spooky 6 lot BTC trade on a Saturday. I don't trade crypto, so I don't trade weekends...
Just now I wrote in their discord that they are scammers and I was deleted from their Discord within a minute.
Not that I regret not being member from their discord anymore, I won't take any challenge from them anymore anyway.
But if you read this, be smart and don't buy any challenges from them

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
I’ve had a really positive experience with FundingTraders so far. The service is smooth, professional, and well organized. My recent payout experience was also very good — the process was straightforward, and my payout was processed quickly.
I also appreciate the support and communication from the team whenever I have questions. Overall, I’m satisfied with the service and happy to continue trading with FundingTraders. Definitely a good experience so far!

Almost bought an account last night. I’m so glad I came to trust pilot. Just got a free 1k account and a 70% off offer on any account from them but with reviews like this, I need to stay away.
Thanks Trustpilot!

Clean rules, zero friction, and lightning-fast processing. Two successful payouts banked so far! Funding Traders makes the process seamless with responsive support, an intuitive platform, and risk rules designed to help traders stay disciplined and succeed.

Multiple Accounts Lost, Payouts Rejected – A Very Disappointing Experience
Imagine successfully completing challenges and reaching funded status, only to lose multiple accounts, have your payouts rejected, and be told that even your next funded account will not be eligible for payment. This was my experience with FundingTraders.
I want to share my experience so that other traders can make an informed decision before purchasing an account with this company.
FundingTraders identified overlapping trades between some of my accounts from January and February. After reviewing the records, I confirmed that the trades and overlaps were real. I am not disputing the accuracy of the trade list. However, I strongly disagree with the interpretation that these trades constituted deliberate or systematic hedging intended to exploit the firm's rules.
The overlapping positions often involved significantly different lot sizes, different closing times, and relatively short overlap periods. In many cases, they did not even generate meaningful profits. In my opinion, there is a significant difference between occasional trading overlaps or management mistakes and deliberately manipulating a firm's risk parameters.
Despite these circumstances, my payout request was rejected and my account was permanently closed.
The situation became even more frustrating with another $200K funded account. A 1% risk restriction was imposed on this account, which I strongly disagreed with because it made normal account management extremely difficult. Eventually, I lost this account with approximately $2,050 in losses.
There was also another $200K account in Phase 2 of its challenge. I successfully completed the challenge and reached funded status. However, before I could even use this account normally, I had already been informed that any future payout would be rejected because of a historical trade match involving this account.
I contacted the company repeatedly and asked for a goodwill exception, at least for this final account. I explained the circumstances and the significant consequences I had already experienced. Unfortunately, the company refused to reconsider its decision.
I have retained the relevant trade records, account information, email correspondence, and supporting documentation. I can substantiate the events and the timeline described in this review.
What concerns me most is not simply the loss of my accounts, but the lack of what I consider to be a fair, proportionate, and constructive review of the circumstances. Traders should be able to expect clear explanations, consistent risk management procedures, and decisions based on the full context of their trading activity.
I am not suggesting that a prop firm should ignore its rules. However, I believe there should be a clear distinction between intentional abuse and occasional overlapping trades that do not demonstrate a systematic attempt to manipulate the rules.
My advice to other traders is to approach FundingTraders with caution. Carefully review the risk management policies, especially those concerning multiple accounts, overlapping positions, and the possibility that historical trades may affect future payouts.
I have made a final attempt to resolve this matter directly with the company, as I would still prefer a fair and amicable solution. I sincerely hope management will reconsider its position and take these concerns seriously.