WSFunded Black Friday: 4 Instant Challenges $68.60

Sabrina was super helpful and friendly! She found what I needed really quickly. Excellent customer service. Thank you, Sabrina!

Thank you so much wsf 2nd payout approved 🙏

Amazing support, great spread and low commission!!! It's been wonderful so far

Reached the Payout Stage Three Times — Contract Terminated
I want to share my disappointing experience with WallStreetFunded, which began in 2025.
First payout — no complaints.
I reached the payout stage on my first account. The company promptly scheduled an interview that lasted just 10 minutes. My payout was approved, and I received the money within 25 hours. Everything was quick and professional, and I was genuinely pleased.
Second payout — identical trading, different outcome.
In November 2025, I reached the payout stage on another account. I used exactly the same strategy, trading approach, and risk management as with my first successful payout. I changed nothing and followed the company’s rules.
This time, however, WallStreetFunded rejected my payout request. Instead of paying the profits, they provided a replacement account and offered me another chance to trade until I qualified for a payout. Why was the same trading acceptable the first time but not the second? Nevertheless, I accepted and continued.
Third payout — seven months of trading, then termination.
Around February 2026, I purchased two more $100,000 Instant Funded accounts. Under the company’s published rules, traders may risk up to 1% per trading idea.
I traded one account for approximately seven months, following the rules throughout. I respected the one-open-trade rule and never exceeded the permitted risk limits. Eventually, I reached the payout stage for the third time. My other $100,000 Instant account was also slightly profitable, up approximately 0.5–1%.
When I requested my payout, the company said it disliked my trading style because I was supposedly using risk close to the maximum allowed level.
But if the rules permit up to 1% risk per trading idea, why is trading within that limit suddenly unacceptable when a payout is requested?
I had not exceeded the stated limits. For seven months, I received no such objections. Yet at payout time, the company said my trading did not fit its internal policies. Instead of paying my profits, it informed me that it intended to terminate our agreement and offered a refund.
My experience, in summary:
The first payout was completed quickly, after a 10-minute interview.
The second was rejected despite my using the same strategy and following the same rules. I received a replacement account instead.
The third came after seven months of rule-compliant trading, but ended with a proposed contract termination rather than a payout.
This leaves me with the impression that WallStreetFunded is not interested in consistently profitable traders who follow its published rules.
If risk close to 1% is unacceptable, why not state that clearly from the beginning? Why raise this objection only when a trader requests payment?
I purchased these accounts expecting transparent conditions and fair treatment. I fulfilled my side of the agreement, but my experience left me unable to trust that the company would fulfill its side.
After three payout requests, two rejections, and a termination notice, I have lost confidence in WallStreetFunded.
I cannot recommend this company to traders looking for long-term cooperation and reliable payouts. In my experience, following the published rules was not enough to secure payment.
Rating: 1 out of 5 stars.

WSF was recommended by Tradeando.net. It is a Trading School with the best traders in Spain.