Ment Funding Black Friday: 40% Off Evaluations

Best prop firm in the biz. From the training to the competitions to the challenges. Thanks Anton and team

**WARNING TO TRADERS: $10,000 SPENT — NOW BLACKLISTED ACROSS MULTIPLE PROP FIRMS OVER AN UNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATION**
I previously purchased a $1 million trading challenge through Ment Funding for approximately $10,000. I failed that evaluation due to my own risk-management mistakes. I accepted responsibility for that loss & had no issues with the company at the time.
When I recently attempted to purchase another challenge, Ment Funding informed me that I was restricted because of an alleged "false chargeback" involving another prop firm.
**I categorically dispute this allegation. It is completely false as presented, & Ment Funding has provided absolutely no evidence substantiating any wrongdoing.**
Despite repeated requests, they failed to identify the originating firm, provide transaction details, disclose supporting evidence, or offer a meaningful appeal or removal process.
Here are Ment Funding's own words:
**"We're unable to confirm an exception or removal process at this time."**
**"An eligibility confirmation alone does not necessarily remove the restriction across our network."**
**"Unfortunately, we're unable to provide a complete list of firms under the restricted network."**
Read that carefully.
They are effectively admitting that a trader can be blacklisted across multiple prop firms based on an undisclosed allegation, without being shown evidence, without a meaningful appeals process, & without even knowing which companies are enforcing the restriction.
**THIS IS A MAJOR RED FLAG FOR EVERY TRADER CONSIDERING PURCHASING AN EXPENSIVE CHALLENGE.**
What happens if you spend thousands of dollars on an evaluation, only to discover that an undisclosed network restriction prevents you from progressing toward funding? What protections do you have when the company cannot even explain how to correct potentially inaccurate information?
Even more disturbing is the treatment of chargebacks. Legitimate disputes happen. A prop firm might fail to provide purchased services, refuse to supply account credentials, or fail to resolve an account-compromise issue. Consumers have valid reasons to seek payment protection.
**A chargeback is not automatically fraud. Yet this company's policy appears to impose blanket restrictions without distinguishing legitimate consumer disputes from fraudulent conduct.**
Imagine being mistreated by one prop firm, legitimately disputing the transaction, & subsequently being blacklisted by multiple unrelated firms. That is an alarming business practice.
**This is exactly why the prop trading industry needs regulatory oversight & enforceable consumer protections.**
I intend to file formal complaints with the Federal Trade Commission & my state's Attorney General requesting examination of these practices for potential unfair or deceptive conduct and consumer-protection violations.
After spending approximately $10,000 with this company previously, I believe prospective customers deserve to know how Ment Funding handles disputed allegations, customer eligibility, & network-wide restrictions.
**My warning: Think very carefully before risking substantial money with a firm that cannot provide transparency, evidence, or a meaningful process to challenge adverse decisions.**
I would not recommend Ment Funding based on this experience.
UPDATE — RESPONSE TO MENT FUNDING:
Anton, you are now publicly claiming that I filed chargebacks & engaged in “chargeback abuse,” yet you have provided absolutely no evidence supporting these accusations.
You cannot identify the firm, the transaction, the date, or any documentation establishing that the alleged chargeback even occurred. You've also stated that you don't have access to the originating firm's information.
How can you accuse me of chargeback abuse when you cannot even substantiate the underlying allegation?
A flag from a payment processor or third-party service provider is not proof that I initiated a chargeback.
I was never asked for proof of anything Ment told me that couldn't provide any info on the chargeback & Best of Luck!
MENT FUNDING'S DISCORD RESPONSE: As per the terms and conditions you read - we can turn away from working with anyone - for any reason. That can just be final and our choice.
We aren’t going to name a random firm because we do not have that kind of relationship with firms or our service providers, payment processors, KYC verification - etc. If you started a chargeback with a firm you should deal with that firm as we don’t have that information. We can’t name firms for you - that’s something you should know. We wish you luck going forward and highly suggest you ensure you understand the rules of any firm you work with before doing so.

I have a lot of experience with prop firms, and I passed the Ment Funding 100k evaluation. The rules are clear and the process was smooth from start to finish. The platform worked well and it was easy to track my progress. I recommend them to anyone looking for a serious prop firm. Now it’s time to focus on the funded account!

I am having fun testing out demo trading with the EAST vs WEST competition accounts on GooeyTrade and the sign up process if very smooth. I was also part of the mentorship for a while and found it very informative and thus branched off to refine my own strategy after learning the course content.
I noticed Anton you reply here so I was wondering if the funded accounts from Mentfunding support TradingView integration? Personally I would prefer to trade directly on TDV if its a possibility. Thank you

Had to write This with ai cause apparently my version had a lot of inappropriate words .
here's my case
I recently participated in your trading competition and finished with a return of +13.50%. During the competition I had only four open positions: one losing trade (−$965.25) and three profitable trades. My maximum lot size was 2.2, and I did not use any prohibited strategies such as Martingale, averaging down, or single high-risk “one-shot” trades.
When I checked the leaderboard, my account was marked as disqualified. This is the second time this has happened to me; on a previous occasion I was ranked #2 on the leaderboard and was also disqualified without a clear explanation.
According to the published leaderboard eligibility rules, traders must meet all of the following criteria to appear on the leaderboard:
At least 3 losing trades
Loss rate ≥ 10%
Max single-trade profit: $10,000 (exceeding this results in disqualification)
Equity drawdown ≥ 1% (largest drop from high to next low)
Profit factor between 1 and 10
Given that I had only one losing trade in this competition, I understand that I may not have met the “at least 3 losing trades” requirement. However, I would appreciate a more detailed explanation of which specific criteria my account failed to meet in both instances, and whether there is any way to view these metrics (number of losing trades, loss rate, max single-trade profit, equity drawdown, and profit factor) for my competition account.
i want to say the rules are dumb af cause i have a pretty good winrate so why would i need to lose 3 times if im competing ???