Crypto Fund Trader Christmas Deal: 20% Off Challenge Pricing

I love cft. I received 3 payments, one came in 24 hours, one in 12 hours, one was interviewed for verification, so it came late compared to CFT. It can be counted within the normal payment time of other companies. The support team is really super.

I love cft because of firstly their rules,
Very simple not complicated and secondly they have good customer care service
They are responsive at all times

I normally don't write reviews, and honestly I considered just letting this go. But I wanted to share my experience for potential customers who are deciding whether to trust this firm, so they can make an informed decision.
I was trading a $100,000 account. My account was later disabled for an alleged trailing drawdown breach, with a reported "last equity" of $93,560.34 against a trailing drawdown limit of $94,000.
The issue is that shortly before the suspension notification, my account equity was around $96300(i seen it myself 5 mins bevor and have even a screenshot from it), while my main open positions — BTC and DOGE shorts — were significantly in profit.
After the suspension, I carefully reviewed:
my account screenshots,
the open position data,
the BTC, DOGE, PAGX, and HYPE charts during the relevant timeframe,
and the account performance data shown in CFT's own dashboard.
Based on the visible market movement and my position sizes, I could not identify any wick, spike, or sudden move that would reasonably explain a drop of roughly $3,000 below the trailing threshold within that short period of time.
There is also a structural point that I find difficult to reconcile. All of my open positions used isolated margin of roughly $900-1000 each, which caps the maximum possible loss per position at its allocated margin. Even in an extreme scenario where my losing-side positions were fully liquidated, the combined maximum loss would not mathematically bring my equity down to $93,560 — particularly while my BTC and DOGE shorts were significantly in profit and would have offset, rather than added to, any drawdown.
To verify the breach, I contacted support and requested:
the exact timestamp of the breach,
the equity snapshot at that moment,
the mark prices used for each open position,
and the unrealized P&L breakdown contributing to the reported equity value.
Support confirmed the account was breached according to their internal risk system, but declined to provide the detailed calculations or position-level data used to determine the breach.
To be fair, there are aspects of CFT I genuinely liked:
straightforward rules,
flexibility in trading style,
and strong crypto integration through Bybit.
I have also previously lost an account with CFT due to my own mistake, and in that case I fully accepted the loss because the breach was understandable and transparent.
This situation feels different. My issue is not simply losing the account. My issue is that the visible data available to me does not appear consistent with the reported breach, while the decisive calculation remains unverifiable from the trader side.
I understand that crypto markets are volatile and that internal mark-price calculations may differ from visible exchange pricing. However, when traders are paying significant fees for evaluations and funded accounts, I believe they should be able to receive sufficiently detailed and timestamped breach data to independently understand and verify why an account was disabled.
Without that level of transparency, trust becomes difficult

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.