Earn2Trade Christmas Offer: 60% OFF First 2 Months on TCP Accounts

This Christmas promotion provides 60% off the first two months on all Trader Career Path subscriptions. Valid until December 31, 2025.
60% OFF CLAIM DEAL
SHOW CODE
Not working? Try our exclusive code - It could save more. PFD 60% OFF

Earn2Trade Christmas Promotion: 60% Off Trader Career Path Models

This Christmas offer reduces the subscription cost by 60% for the first two months on all Trader Career Path (TCP) accounts. The promotion lowers the upfront entry fees and early renewal costs without modifying the trading objectives or account scaling rules.

The discount applies to the monthly subscription payments for the first 60 days following the purchase. After this period, the subscription fee reverts to the standard rate. Additionally, this promotion includes reduced pricing for account resets on the TCP25 and TCP50 models, starting from $55, provided the reset occurs within the same 60-day promotional window.

Who this may suit

This offer may suit traders seeking a lower cost of entry for the Trader Career Path program, specifically those interested in the scaling progression from smaller starting balances ($25k, $50k, or $100k) up to the varying funding caps ($200k or $400k). It is applicable to traders who plan to initiate their evaluation during the holiday period.

Who should be cautious

Traders should be cautious if they anticipate an evaluation period extending beyond two months, as the cost saving is limited to the initial 60-day window. Individuals who require consistent pricing over a longer term should budget for the standard subscription rate once the promotional period expires.

What this discount does not change

This discount is a cost reduction only. It does not alter the profit targets, drawdown limits, or virtual trading environment. The rules for the Trader Career Path, including the scaling steps and risk parameters, remain unchanged.

Quick summary

  • Discount: 60% off for the first 2 months
  • Type: Coupon
  • Applies to: TCP25, TCP50, and TCP100 accounts
  • Validity: Valid until December 31, 2025
  • Best suited for: Traders starting a new TCP subscription
  • Apply via link: https://propfirmdiscount.com/go/earn2trade
Christmas Offer: 60% OFF First 2 Months on TCP Accounts
Get 60% off the first two months on any Trader Career Path account with this holiday deal. Valid until December 31, 2025.
Christmas Offer: 60% OFF First 2 Months on TCP Accounts
Get 60% off the first two months on any Trader Career Path account with this holiday deal. Valid until December 31, 2025.

Recent deals from Earn2Trade

Not working? Try our exclusive code. PFD
Title Coupon Code Discount
60%
50%
60%
60%
60%

Share your real experience with Earn2Trade — Image Proof Optional

Honest reviews – positive or negative – help traders decide with confidence.

No reviews yet.
0 reviews
This prop firm has no user reviews yet on PFD. Be the first to report your experience.
All reviews are submitted by users and reflect personal experiences only. This website does not verify, investigate, or endorse any claims made in user reviews.

Recent reviews Earn2Trade on Trustpilot

4.7 ★★★★★ Based on 4,787 reviews
By Daniel Craver
May 6, 2026

Best help ever from Anjali

Best help ever from Anjali
By DJ
May 6, 2026

Lakshay was super helpful

Lakshay was super helpful, friendly and fast solving my problem.
Reply from Earn2TradeMay 6, 2026
Hello,
Thank you so much for taking the time to share your feedback! We are thrilled to hear that our support team provided you with fast, friendly, and helpful assistance. Ensuring our customers have a smooth and positive experience is our top priority. We are always here to help whenever you need us!
By kuldeep singh
May 5, 2026

Serious Concerns About Execution Transparency and Data Handling

My experience with Earn2Trade has raised serious concerns about execution integrity and transparency.
During a trade on NQ, my position was closed at 27250.50—a price level that did not appear anywhere in the market at that time. I verified this not only across multiple external feeds, but also within the same Rithmic environment (RTrader Pro). There was no trade, no bid/ask, and no recorded price at that level.
I raised a very simple request: show verifiable evidence that this price existed. This could have been done through tick data, time & sales, or order book records from the same source they rely on.
Instead of providing proof, I received repeated generic explanations about “slippage” and “low liquidity.” This completely misses the point. Slippage still requires actual liquidity at a price. You cannot execute at a level that has no footprint in the data.
Even more concerning, this happened on NQ—one of the most liquid instruments—yet they attributed it to “low liquidity” without providing any specific context or data to support that claim.
Due to this specific execution, my account was heavily impacted and pushed close to breach, despite the market later moving in the exact direction of my trade.
To provide context, I am a funded/live trader with multiple firms and have not encountered this type of issue elsewhere. What was particularly unprofessional in this case was the handling of the situation—when I requested factual clarification, I was provided with generic explanations and even references to basic online searches rather than concrete, case-specific evidence.
To make matters worse, my case was closed with a “final explanation” without ever addressing the core issue or providing any verifiable proof. When I continued asking for evidence, communication simply stopped.
There was also a separate concern where my account-related information was shared with third parties in an email thread without prior notice, raising questions about data handling practices.
Key issues:
Execution at a price not visible in the same data feed
No tick-level or order book evidence provided
Generic responses instead of addressing the actual case
Case closed without resolving the discrepancy
Communication stopped when proof was requested
Account significantly impacted due to this execution
Unprofessional support experience lacking technical clarity
This is not about normal trading risk or slippage—I fully understand how markets work. This is about the inability to verify an execution using the same data source that is being used to justify it.
If a platform cannot provide verifiable evidence for a trade execution, then the transparency of the entire system becomes questionable.
Very disappointing experience.
Reply from Earn2TradeMay 6, 2026
Dear Customer,
Thank you for reaching out and sharing your detailed feedback regarding your experience. We take execution transparency very seriously and would like to provide some clarity regarding the mechanics of your order execution.
We would like to explain how order execution works in these market conditions. Candles on a chart do not always show all prices, as this depends on the volume. This is what we call slippage. This occurs because stop orders turn into market orders when they get filled, and market orders are filled at the next available price. All that is required to fill an order is anybody on the other side of the book purchasing whatever you're buying, or all the way around. This is very common when the asset doesn't have a high volume or low liquidity at that exact moment, and in fact, this is what happened to you. As you can see, the 1-second candle barely had movement, meaning liquidity was highly restricted at the exact time of execution.
Regarding your concern about account-related information, we take data privacy seriously and adhere to strict guidelines to ensure your information is handled securely. We value your feedback as it helps us improve our communication and processes. If you would like to discuss the details of your case further, please feel free to reach out to our customer support team directly.
By Luis Cutillas
May 4, 2026

Bad joke

Bad joke. The moment you start earning money, they tell you that you don't meet their standards and revoke all your active accounts and evaluations. While you're spending money on evaluations, nobody says a word, since it's all profit.
They live off your evaluation payments, not by investing in you as a trader. The worst prop firm you could ever find.
Reply from Earn2TradeMay 5, 2026
Hello Luis,
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We’d like to clarify a few important points to ensure the situation is accurately represented.
At no point were earnings withheld or payouts denied. Your account was not closed while you were actively generating profits. The decision was made after your most recent funded account failed, and, based on overall performance, it was determined that you would not continue in the funded program. As part of that decision, you were also asked not to start new evaluations going forward.
This type of decision is based on internal risk management and performance standards that apply to all traders, and it is not related to collecting evaluation fees. Evaluations are designed to assess consistency and risk control before progressing, and continuation in the funded stage depends on meeting those same standards over time.
We understand that this outcome may be disappointing. Still, it’s important to clarify that this was not a case of stopping a trader who was actively earning or withholding any profits. All actions were taken in line with our policies and performance criteria.
If you have any further questions, our team remains available to assist.
By Achraf Sbai
May 1, 2026

I suggest to Truspilot to add 0 stars…

I suggest to Truspilot to add 0 stars because Earn2trade doesn't deserve any.
They scammed me with a slippage of 50 points in MNQ which resulted in my accout being breached although I had a stoploss in place. I have screenshots of everything and I don't recommend them to anyone. I will be going around online telling everyone about these scammers because I don't want anyone else to go through what I went through.
Reply from Earn2TradeMay 5, 2026
Hello Achraf,
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand how frustrating this experience must have been.
It’s important to clarify how execution works in real market conditions. Stop losses do not guarantee a specific exit price; they trigger a market order once the set level is reached, and that order is then filled at the best available market price. In fast-moving or volatile conditions, this can lead to slippage, where the final fill price differs from the intended stop level. While unfortunate, this is a normal part of trading across all platforms, and something traders should account for in their risk management by leaving an additional buffer below their maximum limits.
After carefully reviewing the screenshots you shared, we did not identify any discrepancies in the information provided. One screenshot shows the order details in Rithmic, where the difference between the intended stop price and the executed price is visible, which reflects the slippage explained above. The second screenshot includes a conversation with ChatGPT, which also explains how your position was affected by market execution and slippage. Both screenshots are therefore consistent with normal market behavior and do not indicate any platform error or irregularity.
That said, we understand your concern and how the situation may have felt from your perspective. Our team is always committed to reviewing each case carefully and providing fair solutions whenever possible.
We appreciate your feedback and remain available should you need further clarification regarding order execution or account rules.
Feedback
Prop Firm Discount
Logo