Finotive Funding 50% Off Challenge Pricing For Eid Al-Adha

35% margin xauusd for 100k account, the swap in phase 2 cost me over 0.75% from 9% drawdown, which is a lot if i trade xauusd with 35% margin, terrible spread, hug different in price 5-6% in ukoil or usoil, and to refresh phase 2 u pay 750$ which is 3x of 100k account price , change the rules when u start trading and the reason is risk team and volatility

I regret saying this, but Finotive Funding is the worst funding company I have ever dealt with; I end up spending more than the actual profits I make. This is due to what you call "trivial rules"—they don't just reduce your profit share to 60% or 50%; they slash it to 10% over what they deem a very minor error. Unfortunately, your company’s policy is based on exploiting people and seizing their money. You will not achieve any significant success, and right now, you don't even deserve a one-star rating.
❌Finotive funding
✅Finotive scammers

Real time user-friendly dashboard experience. Fast withdrawals. Quick support response

If you're looking for a smooth trading experience, then sorry, this site is not for you - fully lagging price feed - no matter how smoothly the market moves, the feed still suffers. Spreads are normal to 0.70$ in gold -- an amazing experience of wasting my money

I am very disappointed with my experience with Finotive Funding.
I successfully completed the trading process and reached the reward stage. However, Finotive reduced my reward to only 10%, claiming that my trading showed revenge trading, increased exposure after losses, and inconsistent risk management.
I strongly disagree with this decision.
I use a predefined risk percentage for every trade, and my position size is calculated based on the setup and stop-loss. Finotive mainly relied on comparing lot sizes and the sequence of trades, but many of their examples were separated by many hours or several days and were based on completely new setups.
One example they cited was a trade where I went from 4.32 lots to 3.36 lots after a loss — meaning the second position was actually smaller, not larger. Another example involved a BUY followed by a SELL almost a week later, which was simply a change based on new market conditions.
They also cited a 0.05 → 0.07 US100 trade. In that case, I realized shortly after entering that the initial position size was incorrect, closed it, recalculated the appropriate risk, and re-entered. This was a risk-management correction, not revenge trading.
What makes this especially frustrating is that Finotive themselves stated that re-entering, changing direction, or increasing position size is not automatically prohibited.
I respect Finotive's right to enforce risk management, but I believe reducing my reward to 10% based on assumptions about my trading intentions is unfair and deserves a proper objective review.
I have complete trade history, timestamps and risk calculations that support my explanation.
I purchased my account through PropFirmMatch, and I am also asking them to help escalate this matter.
I hope Finotive reviews this case fairly and urgently and restores the appropriate reward. This experience has been extremely disappointing after successfully completing the process.