FundingTraders Flash Sale: 70% Off Instant Funded & $5000 2-Step Pro For $30

After more than two years of trading with Funding Traders, I can confidently say that I am beyond disappointed and completely turned off by this firm.
My biggest issue is how they seem to constantly introduce, modify, or enforce rules that make absolutely no sense, often resulting in breached accounts or denied payouts. It feels like every time you get close to being successful, there's another rule waiting to disqualify you.
The only positive thing I can say about Funding Traders is that they use TradeLocker, which I personally prefer over MetaTrader. Beyond that, my experience has been nothing but frustration.
Looking back, I should have recognized the red flags much sooner. A prop firm that constantly offers massive discounts to encourage traders to purchase more accounts after failing should raise serious questions about its business model. It creates a cycle where traders keep spending money on challenges while the firm continues collecting fees.
And please, spare me the argument that these rules are designed to make people better traders. Prop firms are not educational institutions. If I wanted to learn how to trade without risking money, I could simply open a free demo account and paper trade.
Funding Traders seems to expect everyone to trade like a grandmother who takes one trade a week, barely risks anything, and somehow magically reaches a profit target. At this point, I genuinely feel like the only way to receive a payout without issues is to take no more than two trades a week, win both, and never experience a loss.
Let's also talk about their 15% consistency rule, which, in my opinion, is absolutely ridiculous compared to other prop firms offering consistency thresholds of 35% to 50%. That difference alone makes their trading conditions unnecessarily restrictive.
What frustrates me most is thinking about the money I've made trading, only to have accounts breached or payouts affected by rules that, in my experience, seem to change or appear out of nowhere. Some of these restrictions weren't even an issue the previous month!
When I calculate how much money I've spent purchasing accounts over the past two years, combined with the profits I believe I could have generated without these restrictions, I genuinely feel I could have been over $200,000 ahead by now had I simply invested that money into my own live trading account instead.
My advice? STAY AWAY FROM FUNDING TRADERS.
Based on my personal experience, this firm appears far more interested in enforcing technicalities that lead to account breaches and payout denials than actually supporting profitable traders. They present these restrictions under the guise of helping you become a disciplined, successful trader, but from where I'm standing, they seem to serve as convenient reasons to avoid paying traders.
After more than two years, I've had enough. I'd rather risk my own capital, trade my own strategy, and keep my profits without constantly worrying about which new rule might disqualify me tomorrow.
A profitable trade should be something to celebrate, not something that makes you nervous about whether you've violated another arbitrary rule.

Storytime. I completed the challenge account but i violated a risk rule of over leverage (identified after challenge account supervision upon completion)) which is not a hard breach.
When you have this you will fall into a risk control group where other stricter rules apply as well.
They had a description about this on the website. I started to trade and my account was breached due to a risk rule that i understood from the description as only a strike which is not a hard breach (after 3 strikes it is). They understood it differently.
So i had a chat with them, a long one. Than I had several emails with them. Long ones.
I articulated my point pretty extensively that the risk rule was not described as a hard breach and guess what? Although they never accepted that they did not have clear instructions, they rewrote the rule page to make these risk control group rules very clear.
Also they reset my account for free.
I haven't had a payout yet, but im pretty sure if there are rules violated and payout denied it will have a clear justification as a rule on the website.
If not, I know what to do now.
So traders, read the rules carefully, im pretty sure people saying denied payouts just simply didnt read the rules.

I traded with FundingTraders for over a year and held two funded PRO10 accounts totalling $300,000.
On September 10, 2026, I requested two payouts totalling $24,715.04. Both were DENIED. I have screenshots from FT's dashboard confirming this.
On September 17, during a recorded call, Luke from Risk Department told me he had approved my payouts, but FT was experiencing payment processor problems. He also discussed arranging a partial payment from company reserves if the delays continued. I retain this recording.
On September 24, FT returned my payouts to review. On September 26, it closed both accounts and denied payment, citing excessive risk and unsustainable trading.
I found no breach of the published numerical PRO10 limits: 5% Daily Loss, 10% Maximum Loss and 2% Risk per Trade Idea. My trades generally risked around 1% with predefined stop losses.
My Clarity Dashboard was GREEN, showing no flagged violations. FT later argued that green status does not guarantee compliance with all its rules.
On September 27, FT's Risk Department explicitly claimed 3.5%–5% intraday floating equity drawdowns. On October 2, Luke wrote that the referenced losses were actually combined across consecutive days, not intraday losses.
FT ultimately relied on broad TOS Section 1.2 provisions and my historical trading performance, including previously failed accounts. Despite repeated requests, I received no reproducible calculations or defined thresholds justifying immediate termination.
FT even claimed I had "blown" my $300K accounts. Yet the last recorded balances on September 25 were $95,217 and $191,932 — both above their published 10% maximum-loss thresholds.
My recommendations to fellow traders:
1. Avoid FundingTraders. In my experience, complying with published numerical limits does not necessarily protect your payout from discretionary decisions (hidden arbitrary rules).
2. If you have a payout pending, consider stopping trading until it is processed. My subsequent losing trades were used to justify denying a payout requested earlier.
3. Do not rely solely on a green Clarity Dashboard. FT explicitly stated that green status does not guarantee full compliance.
4. Be aware of your trading history. Previously failed accounts may be considered during a broader risk review, even after you successfully pass new evaluations.
5. Keep independent records. Save your trade history, payout requests, dashboard screenshots, emails and relevant Terms of Service.
My biggest concern: How did payouts reportedly approved on September 17, with payment processor issues cited as the reason for delay, become completely denied nine days later without FT providing the precise calculations supporting its decision?
My account purchase fees were refunded, but the $24,715.04 payout remained unpaid.
I consider this treatment arbitrary and unfair. I have retained the original emails, recorded calls, trading records and screenshots.
If you have experienced similar payout delays, account closures or payout denials, please share your documented experience publicly.
I will never trade with FundingTraders again.

They told me they would give me a free instant account in exchange for creating an account with the company, but once I finished creating the account, they told me there were no free accounts.

very good support team