The Trading Pit: 40% Off Entry Fee for New Traders

This is the second time,i'm having issues with contract limitations with this company!When something in the market starts to move,they immediatelly downsize the contracts you can use.I paid for an account in which i can use 4 minis or 40 micros,tried to open a trde with 3 mcl and i was restricted.Same thing on october with mgc,but when i contacted support for a chargeback they changed the contacts to normal.This is a disgrace of a company.Currently waiting on a chargeback.Their support team doesn't even know when contract restriction came into effect.

Extremely disappointing experience.
I reached the funded phase, which, according to the rules presented to me, had no consistency requirement. On my first day, I made a substantial profit across several trades. On the remaining days, I traded only enough to meet the minimum trading-day requirement before requesting a payout.
After I submitted my payout request, it went under review. The following day, I received an email stating that they wanted traders to demonstrate consistency. They then removed the profits from my best trading day without adjusting my drawdown threshold. The threshold remained at $50,000, leaving me with only $600 of available drawdown instead of $2,000.
If consistency is required during the funded phase, that requirement should be clearly stated upfront, including how it is measured and what happens if a trader does not meet it. Traders naturally have good days, bad days, and exceptionally profitable days. Had this requirement been disclosed, I would have approached the account differently.
I use several other firms, and this is the only one where I have experienced profits being removed over a consistency requirement that was not stated in the funded-phase rules presented to me.
My main concern is transparency: traders should know the rules before trading, especially when those rules affect payouts and account risk. Based on my experience, I would not recommend this firm.

TradingPit is a scam; they look for any excuse to avoid paying you. They told me that a single trade accounted for 99% of my total profits, when it was actually 43%... they lie so they don’t have to pay you.

My payout was denied for alleged “Account Rolling,” and profits were removed from three of my accounts.
Their original explanation claimed that I repeatedly used high-risk trades across multiple accounts until one succeeded. I appealed and explained that the accounts they cited were actually the same funded accounts executing the same trade simultaneously through copy trading. They were not sequential attempts where one account failed and I moved on to another.
After I challenged the Account Rolling allegation, the explanation changed. They began focusing instead on the fact that one trade generated a large percentage of the profit, that the trade carried significant risk, and that my later trading days had smaller profits.
I repeatedly asked them to explain how simultaneous copy trading constituted Account Rolling, or to identify the specific rule I had actually violated. They never directly answered that question.
Their final response was simply that the Risk Team had reviewed the case again, the original decision remained unchanged, and the matter was closed.
My concern is not that they reviewed my trading. My concern is that a payout was denied under one allegation, and when I challenged the factual basis of that allegation, the justification shifted instead of the original allegation being addressed.
Traders should be aware that payout decisions may depend on broad and subjective interpretations of trading behavior that are not expressed as clear numerical limits beforehand.

thank you trading pit