FundedSquad New Year Deal: 40% Off Instant Models

Think Twice Before Trusting FundedSquad With Your Payouts
My experience with FundedSquad has raised serious concerns about payout transparency and the way trading violations are handled.
When my withdrawal requests were rejected over alleged copy trading, I disputed the allegations and asked for convincing evidence. However, I was not satisfied with the explanation provided by the Risk Team. In my opinion, the evidence shared did not adequately address my concerns or allow me to independently verify the allegations.
I have my own trading analysis, calculations, and video recordings of my trades. I believe every trader deserves a fair review based on clear, verifiable evidence rather than conclusions they cannot properly challenge.
The biggest issue is not just a rejected payout — it is the lack of a satisfactory explanation when a trader questions the decision.
A prop firm should build trust through transparency, consistent rule enforcement, and fair treatment of its customers. My experience has unfortunately left me questioning whether those standards were met.

Very Disappointing Experience – Withdrawals Rejected Without Fair Justification
I had a very disappointing experience with this platform. My withdrawal requests from two separate accounts were rejected, and my trading activity was flagged as copy trading.
Trading fundamentally involves only two basic actions: buying and selling. It is completely possible for multiple traders to place similar trades at the same time, especially when they follow similar market trends or strategies. Similar trades alone should not be treated as sufficient proof of copy trading.
I put in my own time, effort, and analysis to make a profit, yet my withdrawals were rejected. If the platform suspects any violation, it should provide clear evidence and a transparent explanation instead of unfairly withholding traders' hard-earned money.
This experience has seriously damaged my trust in the platform. Traders deserve fair treatment, clear rules, and a proper explanation when their withdrawals are rejected. I strongly urge the company to review my case and release my legitimate earnings.
Think carefully before trusting this platform with your time and money.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ **FundedSquad – A Promising Prop Trading Firm**
I’ve heard many positive things about FundedSquad and its instant funding programs from other traders, which has given me a good impression of the firm. Currently, I’ve received a Two-Step Challenge account through a giveaway, and I’m looking forward to trading it, following all the rules, and working towards passing the challenge.
So far, I’m optimistic about FundedSquad and excited to see how my experience goes. My goal is to trade with discipline, maintain proper risk management, and hopefully achieve my first payout with them, InshaAllah.
I’ll share a more detailed review of my personal experience, including the payout process, once I’ve completed the necessary steps. Looking forward to a positive journey with FundedSquad! 🚀

**Very Disappointing Experience – Payout Rejected Over the Martingale Rule**
I am extremely disappointed with this experience. My payout was rejected, and my account was breached because of the martingale position-sizing rule. This is the fourth time I have faced a payout-related issue, and it has seriously damaged my trust in this firm.
Let’s look at the actual trade details instead of simply flagging trades based on lot size.
**Instance 1 – October 12, 2026 (XAUUSD.w BUY)**
- Losing trade: 0.02 lots
- Closed at: 02:33:43.614
- P/L: -$12.18
- Next trade: 0.18 lots
- Opened at: 02:42:47.254
- **TIME DIFFERENCE: 9 MINUTES AND 3.640 SECONDS**
- P/L: -$142.92
**Instance 2 – October 13, 2026 (XAUUSD.w BUY)**
- Losing trade: 0.03 lots
- Closed at: 01:24:49.724
- P/L: -$22.59
- Next trade: 0.14 lots
- Opened at: 01:58:19.175
- **TIME DIFFERENCE: 33 MINUTES AND 29.451 SECONDS**
- P/L: +$0.98
I understand the concern if I had immediately reopened a trade after a loss to recover my money. However, **neither trade was opened instantly after the previous losing trade closed. There was a gap of more than 9 minutes in the first instance and more than 33 minutes in the second.** These time differences are clearly visible in the trade records.
I understand that the second position was larger than double the previous losing position. However, I believe the time gaps and the overall context of the trades deserve a fair review rather than an automatic rejection.
These were trades on a $25,000 account. You are comparing a 0.02-lot position with 0.18 lots and a 0.03-lot position with 0.14 lots without, in my opinion, adequately considering the context. I want the firm to explain precisely how it interprets and applies this rule.
If the rules explicitly prohibit these trades regardless of the time gap, I expect a clear explanation identifying the exact terms that were violated. But rejecting a payout without adequately considering the circumstances is unacceptable from a trader's perspective.
What makes this worse is that traders invest money in accounts, spend time passing challenges, and expect the published rules to be applied transparently and consistently. If I had planned to purchase a larger account in the future, this experience would make me think twice.
There are other prop firms, including FundingPips, Top One Trader, and Aqua Funded, that traders may consider. Experiences like this make it difficult to trust a firm with more money or recommend it to other traders.
I am requesting a proper manual review of both instances, a clear explanation of the rule interpretation, and reconsideration of my payout rejection. I will provide the screenshots and trade records as evidence.
**A prop firm's credibility depends on transparent rules, fair reviews, and consistent payout decisions. This has been an extremely disappointing experience, and I expect the firm to review my case fairly.**

( UNFAIR AND FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF COPY…
( UNFAIR AND FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF COPY TRADING) ACCOUNT no =180876144 And rejected $2500 payout and BLOCKED MY 50k funded account
Hey guys Im writing this review this review so you can be alert I challenge the team proof me how my account is coming under the copy trading and they send me one sheet for trades as we guys all know we can easily able too make those kind of sheet on Microsoft excel or an software like that because they are scammers they are not even give the reply of my single email moreover Im saying to the that provide e the full number of the account of the others who's they are saying that my account is like with copy trading if they are genuine they should provide and they have too reply me on email but they are not such a scammers im 110% sure my trading is fully legit and there is no reason to reject but they give false reason to reject and to blocked my account. Moreover as there is tagline of there dashboard that free reset on all eval but when I reached to dashboard support team to claim that reset account they said no free/reset account available for you what is this #SCAM