Prop Firm Discount

Funded Trader Markets Up to 60% Off 1-Step Evaluations

Funded Trader Markets offers up to a 60% discount on 1-step evaluation accounts valid until April 15th. This promotion reduces the upfront entry cost only and does not change any trading rules or drawdown limits.
Ended · Published: April 3, 2026
60% OFF CLAIM DEAL
SHOW CODE

Funded Trader Markets Up to 60% Off 1-Step Evaluations

Funded Trader Markets is currently offering up to a 60% cost reduction on 1-step evaluation accounts. This promotion strictly reduces the upfront entry fee and does not change any evaluation criteria, trading rules, or drawdown limits.

By applying the active promotion at checkout, traders receive a tiered discount of up to 60% on the purchase of a 1-step challenge. The offer remains available until April 15th.

Who this may suit

This pricing structure may suit individuals seeking a lower initial purchase price for a 1-step evaluation model.

Who should be cautious

Traders should be cautious if they are drawn solely by the discount, as market risks and the difficulty of passing the challenge remain identical.

What this discount does not change

The promotion affects purchase pricing only and does not modify trading rules, drawdown limits, or risk parameters.

Quick summary

Up to 60% Off 1-Step Challenge Fees
Reduce your upfront entry cost by up to 60% on 1-step evaluation accounts. Valid until April 15th, this offer strictly lowers the purchase price without altering trading rules or risks.
Up to 60% Off 1-Step Challenge Fees
Reduce your upfront entry cost by up to 60% on 1-step evaluation accounts. Valid until April 15th, this offer strictly lowers the purchase price without altering trading rules or risks.

Recent deals from Funded Trader Markets

Title Coupon Code Discount Expires
75% Ended
Get 50K Ended
60% Off 2-Step Evaluation Account Cost Published: March 17, 2026
60% Ended
60% Ended
40% Ended

Recent reviews Funded Trader Markets on Trustpilot

2.9 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†β˜† Based on 455 reviews
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Yokaris JT
November 4, 2026

Title: Unfair Breach Triggered Due to Incorrect Calculations - Account #FTM-275333

I am writing this review regarding my evaluation account #FTM-275333. My account was marked as BREACHED due to an alleged daily drawdown violation, but the platform's calculations do not match reality.
My total floating loss on open positions was around $240, which was strictly managed and nowhere near my allowed limit or even $300. Despite this, the system incorrectly registered a breach at -$405.61.
There is a clear discrepancy between the actual open positions and the drawdown calculation registered by the platform. I have already contacted support for a thorough manual review of the trade logs, spreads, and execution feeds. I expect a transparent investigation and resolution into why a $240 floating loss resulted in a breach. I will update this review based on the support team's response.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Darsh Savsani
November 4, 2026

Extremely Disappointing Experience with Funded Trader Markets

My experience with Funded Trader Markets has been extremely disappointing.
I requested a withdrawal of $3,708 (after 88 days hard work), but instead of receiving a fair resolution, I was informed that multiple trading rule violations had been identified during a compliance review. The company subsequently applied deductions totalling $4,811.23, reduced my eligible reward to zero, rejected my withdrawal, and classified my account as breached.
My biggest concern is not just the deductions, but the complete lack of timely communication and transparency.
If the company has such a detailed monitoring system to identify violations like Minimum Holding Time, Overnight Hedging, and Partial Close Rules, why aren't traders notified when these activities are detected? Why wait until the withdrawal stage to disclose multiple violations?
Traders should have an opportunity to understand potential violations and correct their practices in time, rather than facing unexpected financial consequences at the withdrawal stage.
What makes the situation even more concerning is that the company's own communication states that certain violations do not independently constitute an account breach, yet the final action resulted in my account being breached.
I strongly believe that compliance policies should be implemented transparently and consistently, not become an unexpected surprise when a trader requests their hard-earned performance reward.
My concerns:
- No timely notification of potential rule violations.
- Significant deductions communicated only at the withdrawal stage.
- No satisfactory explanation of how the deductions ultimately justified an account breach.
- Zero eligible reward despite the requested withdrawal of $3,708.
I would strongly encourage traders to carefully review every rule and understand how these policies are enforced before purchasing an account.
I hope Funded Trader Markets reconsiders its approach and improves its transparency, communication, and dispute-resolution process.
Based on my experience, I cannot recommend this firm.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By M. Yassine
October 31, 2026

Misleading "Static" Label vs. Dynamic Daily Drawdown Reality (Account #268405)

I am writing this review to share my transparent experience with Funded Trader Markets regarding my 1-Step Infinity Evaluation account (#268405).
While the program is marketed with a "Static Drawdown" label, traders should be fully aware that this only applies to the Overall Drawdown. The Daily Drawdown is fully dynamic/relative, calculated from the peak equity/balance snapshot at the 5 PM ET reset.
In my case:
Initial Account Size: $20,000Β 
My account made profits, reaching $20,790.41 at the daily reset.
The 3% daily loss limit ($600) was deducted from this peak equity, establishing a daily threshold of $20,190.41.
When my equity dipped slightly to $20,150.20 (still $150.20 in profit overall above my initial capital), the account was automatically breached.Β 
While support clarified that this complies with their hidden FAQ terms, using the term "Static" in primary marketing materials creates major ambiguity for traders who expect a fixed loss boundary relative to their initial balance.Β 
If you trade with FTM, be extremely careful: any floating profit held at 5 PM ET will aggressively pull your daily breach level upward, turning a profitable account into a breach within a tiny margin.
I hope FTM updates their marketing language to reflect the dynamic nature of their daily drawdown rules more transparently.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By Medsergio
October 30, 2026

This prop furm is a scam 🚨🚨

This prop furm is a scam 🚨🚨
I purchased a Step Plus-2 5K account (Phase 1). It was closed with a "hard breach" on 30/10/2026. The emails (soft breach, then hard breach) say my open trades exceeded the "maximum allowed Profit & Loss level", but none of them mention the actual limit or the value recorded.
My dashboard shows a total loss of only $108.98 (2.18%), well below the 5% daily limit and 10% max drawdown, with only 3 closed trades. I've emailed support asking for the exact limit and the recorded value, and I'm still waiting for an answer.
Rules like this should be stated clearly in the account details and in the breach emails. I'll update this review once I hear back.
β˜…β˜†β˜†β˜†β˜†
By customer
October 30, 2026

My account number is 270249 I am…

My account number is 270249 I am extremely disappointed with this company. My account was closed unfairly even though my loss was only -$68, while the maximum daily loss limit was -$200.
I was clearly within the permitted risk limits, yet the company decided to breach and close my account without providing a reasonable explanation.
This experience has made me lose trust in this company. I believe their decision was unfair, and I expect them to review my case and take responsibility for their mistake.
I strongly advise other traders to be careful and fully understand the risks before trusting this company with their money.
I hope the company will resolve this issue and restore my account.
Feedback