Funded Trader Markets: 75% Off 2 Step Plus 5K–50K Evaluations

The claims made in this review are intentionally framed to be inaccurate.
You state that after reading every rule you started trading and your account breached without cause. However the breach was triggered by the Maximum Floating Loss rule, specifically the 1% floating loss limit which applies to your 2-Step Plus Evaluation account because you opted for the free 90% profit split add-on during purchase. This rule is not hidden, it is not buried, and it is not missing from any profile. It is displayed at the point of purchase on the checkout page and is documented across our main website FAQ, our live chat help centre, and our Discord server FAQ channel. If you read every rule as stated, this rule was there to be read at multiple points before you even placed your first trade.
Furthermore, the first time this rule was violated on your account, a warning email was sent to you immediately. That was a direct notification that the floating loss limit had been breached and an opportunity to pause, read the rule in full, and reach out to our support team for clarification. That opportunity was not taken. Trading continued and the rule was violated again, which triggered the hard breach and resulted in the account being closed. This is the exact process as documented.
On the stop loss being set at 0.98%, a stop loss controls where your position exits and protects against the final closed loss. It does not control the floating unrealised loss while the trade is running. The Maximum Floating Loss rule is triggered the moment the combined floating P&L across open positions reaches -1% of your account capital at any given point during the trade, regardless of where your stop loss is set. These are two separate mechanisms and one does not override the other. If the floating loss hits -1% before the stop loss is triggered, the rule triggers. That is how it works and that is how it is documented.
You did in fact reach out to our live chat team after the hard breach occurred. The agent who responded provided a detailed breakdown of exactly what happened and followed up shortly after to check if you had any further questions or anything to add. That message was read. No reply was sent. You then came here and left this review instead. That is not the behaviour of someone who has been ignored or dismissed. That is the behavior of someone who received a clear explanation, did not like the answer, and chose to escalate publicly rather than engage further.
Adding that you have a social media community of 100k traders is also irrelevant here. We respond the same way regardless of audience size. The facts of this case do not change based on how many people are watching.
The Compliance Team
Funded Trader Markets