AquaFunded 35% Off Evaluation Cost, Buy 1 Get 1 Free, and 120% Refund (300 Uses)

I purchased a $5000 instant account to test how payouts work. I now need to make a return of at least 0.5% for five days before being able to request a payout, along with the consistency rule (which I was aware of). This will be the case for every single payout. There's also a maximum of $100 withdrawal amount on my account. So, realistically, I'll need to make at least $125 in order to get a payout, of which I'll only be able to withdraw $100 of.
In fairness, if you dig and dig you can painstakingly find all of this information on their website. The whole platform is set up for you to fail and if you do succeed, it's hard to get rewarded for it.

Besides the huge commission and spread, I left trades at break even and abit of more pips to account for everything they still close my trades in negative, more than once this happened...
Another thing, I was trading 3 days and noticed the trading days counter is not working they told me only now that I have to make 0.5% per day for a day to count (other prop firms dont do this by the way)
Im going back to well known prop firms that dont rob people, STAY AWAY

I had a very disappointing experience with AquaFunded’s affiliate program.
I promoted their service as an affiliate and generated traffic through my own content and marketing efforts. However, when it came time to review and pay the affiliate commission, the process became extremely difficult and unclear.
I provided evidence and explanations about my promotional activity, including that my traffic was based on independent content and user-intent promotion, not brand impersonation or misleading activity. Despite this, the commission issue has not been resolved fairly from my side.
As an affiliate partner, I expect clear communication, transparent rules, and a fair review process before any commission is rejected or withheld. Unfortunately, my experience has left me feeling that affiliates may not be properly protected when payment issues arise.
I hope AquaFunded reviews this case again, communicates clearly, and resolves the pending commission matter in a fair and professional way.

Nothing much to say other than Aquafunded are absolutely the best leading propfirm out their, no one come close.

My experience with AquaFunded was extremely disappointing.
I traded several funded accounts that were all owned and operated by me. All trades were executed manually through MT5. I did not use VPNs, VPS services, copy trading software, signal providers, or third-party account management.
After requesting three payouts, one payout was approved and paid successfully. Shortly afterward, AquaFunded contacted me asking whether I used any VPN, proxy, or copy trading tools. I answered honestly and explained that I traded all accounts manually using the same personal strategy.
A few days later, AquaFunded rejected my remaining payouts and terminated my accounts. They claimed there were IP overlaps with other traders and "access patterns" that raised concerns. However, despite repeatedly asking for clarification, I was never provided with any specific evidence showing that I violated a rule.
I requested:
The exact rule I allegedly violated;
Details of the network activity they considered suspicious;
Evidence supporting the accusation of coordinated trading.
None of this information was provided. Instead, I received generic responses stating that the decision was final.
What makes the situation even more concerning is that AquaFunded acknowledged that copy trading between a trader's own accounts is allowed and confirmed that trade similarity was not the primary issue. Nevertheless, my payouts were denied based on allegations that were never properly explained or supported with evidence.
After refusing my payouts, AquaFunded offered to refund my account fees and sent me a Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreement that would have prevented me from publicly discussing my experience. I chose not to sign it.
I fully support firms investigating suspicious activity. However, if a company decides to deny payouts and terminate accounts, traders deserve transparency, clear explanations, and evidence to support such serious actions.
I will attach screenshots and documents so readers can review the communications themselves and form their own opinion.
For transparency, I have uploaded supporting evidence to a Google Drive folder, including email communications with AquaFunded, payout-related correspondence, and the Non-Disclosure & Non-Disparagement Agreement that was sent to me after my payouts were denied. I encourage anyone reading this review to examine the documentation and draw their own conclusions based on the facts.
Contact and i share the proofs, can't upload here