AquaFunded: 50% Off Instant Models and 35% Off Other Challenges

I participated in Aqua Funded's May Free Competition and was later informed that I had been disqualified because I allegedly breached their 2% Maximum Floating Loss rule.
The problem is not the disqualification itself. The problem is that nobody has been able to provide any evidence that such a breach actually occurred.
I repeatedly asked for:
The trade ticket number;
The date and time of the alleged breach;
The maximum floating loss recorded;
The calculation used by their risk team.
To this day, none of this information has been provided.
Instead, I received responses such as:
"our risk team said you breached the rule"
and
"their word is final."
What concerns me most is that my account was never blocked, suspended, or restricted during the competition. I was allowed to continue trading throughout the entire month. Only after the competition ended was I informed that I had supposedly violated a rule and therefore could not receive the prize.
When I pointed out this inconsistency and requested proof, the responses became dismissive, including phrases such as "tough luck" and "better luck on your next FREE competition."
I have no issue accepting responsibility when I make a mistake. However, if a company claims that a trader violated a rule, it should be able to identify the specific trade and provide objective evidence.
My experience with Aqua Funded was disappointing because transparency was completely absent from the review process. I will let other traders read the conversation (I have all printed out, if someone wants to see how unprofessional their customer service are) and decide for themselves whether this is the level of professionalism they expect from a prop firm.

Nothing much to say other than Aquafunded are absolutely the best leading propfirm out their, no one come close.

My experience with AquaFunded was extremely disappointing.
I traded several funded accounts that were all owned and operated by me. All trades were executed manually through MT5. I did not use VPNs, VPS services, copy trading software, signal providers, or third-party account management.
After requesting three payouts, one payout was approved and paid successfully. Shortly afterward, AquaFunded contacted me asking whether I used any VPN, proxy, or copy trading tools. I answered honestly and explained that I traded all accounts manually using the same personal strategy.
A few days later, AquaFunded rejected my remaining payouts and terminated my accounts. They claimed there were IP overlaps with other traders and "access patterns" that raised concerns. However, despite repeatedly asking for clarification, I was never provided with any specific evidence showing that I violated a rule.
I requested:
The exact rule I allegedly violated;
Details of the network activity they considered suspicious;
Evidence supporting the accusation of coordinated trading.
None of this information was provided. Instead, I received generic responses stating that the decision was final.
What makes the situation even more concerning is that AquaFunded acknowledged that copy trading between a trader's own accounts is allowed and confirmed that trade similarity was not the primary issue. Nevertheless, my payouts were denied based on allegations that were never properly explained or supported with evidence.
After refusing my payouts, AquaFunded offered to refund my account fees and sent me a Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreement that would have prevented me from publicly discussing my experience. I chose not to sign it.
I fully support firms investigating suspicious activity. However, if a company decides to deny payouts and terminate accounts, traders deserve transparency, clear explanations, and evidence to support such serious actions.
I will attach screenshots and documents so readers can review the communications themselves and form their own opinion.
For transparency, I have uploaded supporting evidence to a Google Drive folder, including email communications with AquaFunded, payout-related correspondence, and the Non-Disclosure & Non-Disparagement Agreement that was sent to me after my payouts were denied. I encourage anyone reading this review to examine the documentation and draw their own conclusions based on the facts.
Contact and i share the proofs, can't upload here

I successfully passed my evaluation and hit my targets with AquaFunded, but when I requested my payout, it was rejected and my account was closed. They claimed a "shared device" violation.
I use a private, dedicated commercial VPS from Hapih Host. When I asked support (Ryan and Corey) to provide the specific timestamps or device identifiers so I could verify this with my server logs, they completely refused to provide a single shred of data, stating they "will not extend in further communication."
Worse yet, when I asked for a refund of my account fee, they attempted to force me to sign a strict Non-Disclosure and Non-Disparagement Agreement (NDA) to hold my refund hostage in exchange for my silence.
If a prop firm flags your account based on an unverified, recycled commercial VPS footprint, refuses to provide transparent evidence, and tries to legally gag you from warning other traders, they are not a safe platform. Avoid AquaFunded if you actually expect to get paid out on your hard-earned profits.
"UPDATE (June 3, 2026):"
UPDATE: The company's reply above is misleading. They claim this was "explained in detail," but support repeatedly refused to give me a single timestamp or date for two days, only stating they "will not extend in further communication" until I publicly pushed back and got a screen shot an hour back
They have finally cited a single date (May 21st). I have immediately escalated this specific date to my VPS provider, Hapih Host, whose engineering team is currently running a formal audit on my private server logs for that exact day to investigate this automated flag. I have nothing to hide and am completely transparent, while AquaFunded is using automated, unverified metrics to block hard-earned payouts.
Update as on 4th june at 2.22 pm
After presenting technical data regarding my shared VPS infrastructure, AquaFunded management has agreed to escalate the case to their technical team to verify if their proprietary system triggered a false positive hardware match on May 21st. The review remains active, and I will continue to update it as their investigation progresses.

Very quickly they replied and all information is correct.