FTUK December Offer: 30% OFF All Plans + Feature Upgrades

When I first discovered FTUK, I considered it one of the better prop firms. However, my recent payout experience has made me seriously question the transparency and consistency of the process.
FTUK’s policies are very clear. They state that certain violations, such as HFT or three or more trades closed in under 30 seconds, can result in an immediate hard breach and account closure. If FTUK determined that my trading violated one of these rules, my question is: why wasn’t my account closed at the time of the alleged violation, as the policy clearly states? Why was the account allowed to continue trading and only raised as an issue when I requested a payout?
I submitted my payout request almost 8 days ago and still have not received a clear final decision or explanation. I understand that accounts may need to be reviewed, but traders deserve transparency about what rule was allegedly violated, how it applies, and what the final decision is.
If the system cannot consistently enforce the rules when violations occur, then I believe the system or the way these policies are enforced needs to be reviewed.
I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m asking for clear communication, consistency, and transparency. Right now, this experience makes me hesitant to continue trading with the confidence that my future payouts will be handled fairly and clearly. I will remain prudent with FTUK going forward. ✌🏽

I've been with FTUK for some time now, and they have become a really important part of my journey as a trader.
I've been trading for a number of years and now work professionally within trading education and coaching, but having the opportunity to trade funded capital through FTUK has helped me take another step forward in my own trading.
What has stood out for me most is the support and communication from the FTUK team. Whenever I've had a question or needed clarification on something, I've been able to speak to the moderators and get a genuine response. You never feel like you're just an account number, and I've built a really good relationship with the team over time.
I've now successfully received multiple payouts from FTUK, and I've just had another payout approved. The process has always been straightforward, and it's a great feeling when you see the work and consistency you've put into your trading rewarded.
FTUK has also helped me become much more structured in the way I approach funded trading. I'm far more focused on risk management, consistency and protecting my capital, rather than simply trying to make as much as possible as quickly as possible.
There are a huge number of prop firms out there now, but my personal experience with FTUK has been extremely positive. Having traded with them for a considerable period of time and actually received multiple payouts, I can speak from genuine experience rather than simply reviewing a company after purchasing an account.
A massive thank you to the FTUK team and especially the moderators who are always around to help and support the community.
It's been a fantastic journey so far, and I'm looking forward to continuing it with FTUK and hopefully achieving many more payouts in the future.

I passed FTUK's funded trader challenge and submitted
a legitimate payout of $2,579.20 on August 28, 2026
(Account 333391111, total account value $3,968).
FTUK rejected it citing martingale violations. Their
own representative reduced flags from 10 to 6 after
my dispute — admitting several were invalid.
The remaining flags fail their own published rules:
- Multiple flagged trades closed at PROFIT — profit
is not loss recovery by any martingale definition
- Trades flagged across completely different
instruments and asset classes — US30 vs USTEC,
BTCUSD vs USTEC
- One sequence had a $297.86 profit trade sitting
BETWEEN the two flagged tickets — their own FAQ
says martingale means the NEXT trade after a loss
- One sequence begins after a trade that closed at
$184.50 PROFIT — martingale after a win is not
defined anywhere in their rules
FTUK's Martingale FAQ dated May 16, 2026 contained
NO risk percentage formula. After my dispute began
they silently updated it — "Updated this week"
September 2026 — adding a new formula they then used
to retroactively justify my rejection.
MOST SERIOUSLY — FTUK promised my challenge fee
refund in writing. When I followed up, they issued
a refund receipt. That receipt was fake. No funds
were ever received. A written promise followed by
a fraudulent payment document is not a technical
error — it is deliberate deception.
This matter has been reported to the FCA, Financial
Ombudsman, Action Fraud UK, and MetaQuotes. Evidence
preserved includes both FAQ versions with timestamps,
full MT5 trade history, all email correspondence,
the written refund promise, and the fraudulent
receipt issued by FTUK.
This company will take your fee, block your payout,
and issue fake receipts when challenged.

FTUK is very good in terms of service it does not harm clients , it is highly recomended ,i will promoted it to my friends to indonesia

Support continues to be prompt and helpful!!